Latest News

Hot Issues
spacer
Five steps towards a more confident retirement
spacer
Financial literacy in Australia: Where we're improving (and falling behind)
spacer
CSLR levy on SMSFs unfair
spacer
SMSF pension shortfall – when can trustees self-assess?
spacer
How to turn your annual SMSF investment strategy review into a genuine analytical exercise
spacer
Super viewed as mortgage solution
spacer
Tokenisation to change SMSF landscape
spacer
Check out the largest castles by country
spacer
ATO’s LRBA data significantly less than industry figures
spacer
New deeming thresholds could deliver small part age pension
spacer
Can I still get the Age Pension if my super is healthy?
spacer
New to SMSFs? Start preparing for your first SAR lodgment
spacer
Contribution splitting now more valuable
spacer
Six ways Gen X can build retirement savings
spacer
How to maximise the impact of your inheritance
spacer
How Our Diets have Changed.
spacer
Adequate retirement savings misjudged
spacer
The SBSCH will close from 1 July 2026
spacer
Complications of maintaining two cost bases in Div 296
spacer
What the Payday Super changes mean for your retirement
spacer
investment and economic outlook 2026
spacer
Rules apply to gifting in superannuation
spacer
Record SMSF growth driven by digital access
spacer
The evolution of the world's languages
spacer
Minimum pension drawdown not the only thing to consider as 30 June approaches
spacer
ASIC urges Aussies to check for unclaimed money
spacer
PAYDAY SUPER STARTS 1 JULY 2026 – Planning guides
spacer
Commercial v residential: Be aware of ‘nuanced’ changes
spacer
Six strategic investment moves for mid-career women
spacer
Your 30 June superannuation checklist
spacer
What’s your risk profile?
spacer
Check out what Uses the Most Internet Traffic: Data from 1994 to 2026
spacer
Key tax changes and measures from the 2026 Federal Budget
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2026
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2026
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2025
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2025
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2025
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2025
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2024
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2024
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2024
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2024
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2023
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2023
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2023
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2023
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2022
CSLR levy on SMSFs unfair

The Institute of Public Accountants has criticised the government’s intention to impose a levy on SMSF trustees to fund the CSLR.

 

The Institute of Public Accountants has criticised the government’s intention to impose a levy on SMSF trustees to fund the CSLR.

The Institute of Public Accountants (IPA) has questioned the long-term viability of the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort (CSLR) and confirmed its opposition to the government’s intention of imposing a levy on SMSF trustees to fund it.

“The Compensation Scheme of Last Resort … is broken and is not sustainable,” IPA advocacy and emerging policy general manager Michael Davison said.

However, Davison acknowledged amending the CSLR framework to determine compensation amounts based on actual losses, eliminating the ‘but for’ provision, was a positive development, but maintained including SMSF trustees in the monetary support of the consumer protection measure is imprudent.

“Removing the ‘but for’ provision where a consumer may be compensated for potential losses, and not actual capital losses, will help, but forcing SMSF trustees to pay a levy is grossly unfair,” he indicated.

“SMSF members are no different to any other retail investor. They are individuals or families who just happen to invest in their retirement through a specific type of government-approved savings vehicle. They have been targeted by these predatory schemes and are victims just like any other retail investor.

“SMSF trustees invest their life savings, often based on licensed financial advice – which is regulated by ASIC – just like any other retail investor. They entrust their savings to the product providers and financial advisers and expect them to act in their best interests. They should not have to insure their own savings in case there is misconduct or product failure caused by others, which they have no control over.”

With regard to the introduction of the new class of adviser, he supported the idea, but was critical of its limited application.

“The financial adviser population has halved and it is difficult for consumers to access quality affordable financial advice. However, limiting the new class of adviser to superannuation funds and insurers is a missed opportunity,” he noted.

“There is a large pool of qualified professionals, such as accountants, that could be utilised to provide limited or scaled financial advice to consumers, giving them more opportunities to access quality affordable professional advice.”

 

 

 

By: Darin Tyson-Chan | August 24, 2026 | smsfadviser.com

Site by Plannerweb