Latest News

Hot Issues
spacer
ATO issues guidance on SMSF trustee appointment and compliance
spacer
ASIC to increase audit surveillance in 2025–26
spacer
Investment and economic outlook, May 2025
spacer
Legal case has succession planning lessons for SMSF members, advisers: legal expert
spacer
Your 30 June superannuation checklist
spacer
Start-ups to suffer under Div 296
spacer
New SMSF trustees propel uptake of financial advice
spacer
Comparison of various Animal Weight
spacer
$95bn loss predicted to Australian economy if Div 296 passes: analysis
spacer
Why more Australian SMSF owners are looking to global equities
spacer
Investment and economic outlook, April 2025
spacer
Trustees reminded of minimum pension drawdown
spacer
How boosting your super can help you reduce your tax bill
spacer
Are your adult children ready for the wealth transfer?
spacer
Financial abuse move now a certainty
spacer
Freshwater Resources by Country 2025
spacer
Investment and economic outlook, March 2025
spacer
Advisers should be aware of signs of elder abuse in SMSF structures
spacer
SMSFs hold record levels of cash and property
spacer
Trustees warned on early access
spacer
The Largest Empires in the World's History
spacer
All the documents, fact sheets and downloads to do with this year’s 2025-26 Federal Budget
spacer
Winners and Losers - Federal Budget 2025-26
spacer
Building Australia's future and Budget Priorities
spacer
Four SMSF breaches high on the ATO’s radar
spacer
Home is where the super is for many Australians
spacer
Investment and economic outlook, February 2025
spacer
TBC increase not just about pensions
spacer
SAR non-lodgment continues to be a concern: ATO
spacer
Increase in prohibited loans a concern: ATO
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2025
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2024
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2024
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2024
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2024
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2023
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2023
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2023
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2023
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2022
Divorce doesn’t alter contribution rules

The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) has upheld an ATO decision to impose an excess contributions penalty and rejected a taxpayer’s claim a divorce-related superannuation split constituted special circumstances under taxation law.

.

The case involved a taxpayer, BVZH, who went through a divorce that resulted in a split of his total superannuation balance of $1,820,792 with his former wife, with the majority of the funds held in the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme and an SMSF.

The taxpayer’s superannuation balance dropped by $427,497 as a result of transferring an amount from the proceedings, bringing his total super balance to about $1.39 million in 2020.

In June 2020, believing his reduced balance allowed him to make a non-concessional contribution, BVZH deposited $100,000 into his SMSF. He later admitted to making this contribution as an “honest mistake” and had not sought legal or accounting advice before making it.

The ATO issued a determination and imposed an excess contribution penalty of $47,000 because his non-concessional contributions cap was determined to be nil as his balance exceeded the $1.6 million general transfer balance cap at the start of the financial year.

BVZH contested the decision and argued the circumstances of his divorce and superannuation split constituted special circumstances under section 292-465 of the Income Tax Assessment Act (ITAA1997, which would allow his contribution to be reallocated or disregarded.

However, the regulator rejected the taxpayer’s argument, stating divorce and superannuation splits were common occurrences and do not qualify as special circumstances under the section of the ITAA referenced by BVZH.

Dissatisfied with the result, he took the matter to the AAT to challenge the ATO’s decision, with the tribunal dismissing the taxpayer’s claim and agreeing with the regulator that a reduction in a superannuation balance as a result of divorce did not meet the legal definition of special circumstances set out in the ITAA.

“Quite clearly, as he contended, had he made the non-concessional contribution of $100,000 in the subsequent financial year, the non-concessional contributions for that year would not have been exceeded,” AAT senior member Robert Cameron stated.

“As has been observed, the cases where special circumstances have been found for the purposes of Division 292, and therefore the discretion enlivened, are very few indeed.

“A feature of most of the cases where special circumstances have been found to have arisen are due to the taxpayer being actively misled or otherwise acting under a misapprehension as to particular circumstances which have been caused or induced by acts or omissions of others.

“In this case the predicament that the applicant finds himself in was solely due to his failure to understand the application and effect of section 292-85(2) of the ITAA.”

 

 

 

 

 

October 22, 2024
Todd Wills
smsmagazine.com.au

Site by Plannerweb