Latest News

Hot Issues
spacer
SMSFs attract younger members
spacer
Heed restrictions on downsizer contributions
spacer
Access to more resources and tools than most websites.
spacer
Valuations key to avoiding NALI restrictions
spacer
SMSF advice appetite strong, says ASIC
spacer
For a smoother path to investment success, diversify
spacer
How's Australia doing statistically?
spacer
LRBA changes mostly affect Melbourne, Sydney retirees
spacer
Lessons from the 2019 Index Chart
spacer
The global economy at midyear: How our views have changed
spacer
The biggest global corporations since 1998
spacer
‘Retrospective’ LRBA measures tipped to cause headaches
spacer
Downsizer Super Contribution
spacer
Keep track of how Australia is really ticking over.
spacer
Insights from the 2019 Vanguard / Investment Trends SMSF survey
spacer
What falling interest rates mean for investors
spacer
ATO releases ‘welcome guidance’ on death benefit income streams
spacer
Super growth reducing age pension drawdown
spacer
Big four firm outlines new financial year checklist for SMSFs
spacer
Asset allocation as you age
spacer
Australia - the story goes on.
spacer
Consolidate your super and save
spacer
Critical documentation steps flagged with switching SMSF loans
spacer
Good investment habits versus damaging biases
spacer
Control considerations flagged with death benefit pensions for children
spacer
Interest rate for SMSF loans set to rise under safe harbour terms
spacer
Recession on our mind
spacer
What it will take to close the super gap between men and women
spacer
Australia - How are we going as 2018-19 ends?
spacer
LRBAs, guarantees in need of review after property market falls
Article archive
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
spacer
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
spacer
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
spacer
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
spacer
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Average age for establishing SMSFs sitting at 48.9: Report

       

 

The latest SMSF Benchmark Report from Class indicates that there is a continuing trend towards younger age groups setting up SMSFs, which follows similar findings from recent ATO statistics.

In its latest SMSF Benchmark Report for the March quarter, SMSF software company Class analysed 26,100 funds comprising 46,943 members, which were newly established on Class within a five-year period spanning from 2014 to 2018.

Analysis of the data found that the average age of members establishing SMSFs was 48.9, with a small difference occurring between gender.

While the average establishment age based on the data set did increase from 48.6 in 2014 to a high of 49.5 in 2017, it has now fallen back to 48.9, the report said.

“There is a continuing trend for members of new SMSFs to be from younger age groups,” the report said.

“One factor that may see this trend continue is the proposal to increase the superannuation guarantee from its current rate of 9.5 per cent by half a percentage point from July 2021, until it hits 12 per cent in 2025.”

This will enable the younger workforce to accumulate greater super balances at a younger age over time, Class said.

SMSF statistics released by the ATO last week similarly indicated that around two-thirds of all new SMSF entrants are under the age of 50.

The Class report also showed that, while the average individual member balance of a newly established fund is around $225,000, the average fund balance is nearly $406,000, ranging from $355,000 for a single-member fund to over $500,000 for four-member funds.

The analysis also indicated that males have a 42 per cent higher balance on average compared with females when funds are established.

However, the gap is significantly lower across all SMSFs at 21 per cent, indicating that the gender gap does narrow over time, the report said.

 

 

Miranda Brownlee
06 May 2019
smafadviser.com

 

Site by Plannerweb